That this what it is. This is not the Harpaz affair, it is not the document as forged or not, it's not relentless subversion mike weinberg (under Barak? Really? Golnz'ik I will not say what I think about him in the face of the most decorated military commander? Say it will not force a compliment), It brigadier general who was the chief of staff's right hand and three years after his release he has a computer in his IDF and God knows what. And why God? that you tell no one. that in my case it was important to tell everyone mike weinberg how much quantity and severity documents indicate Security-informational crime serious history of the IDF, in the case of chubby nobody would bother to find out. That it probably does not matter when it comes to one of us (By the way, what ours? I thought junta Golani is the most passe. Follow me paratroopers).
I saw Benayahu were not charged with or suspected of classified documents currently holding mike weinberg (why, really?) And the remaining entries of course mike weinberg as long as he has not been convicted mike weinberg in court is credited to the presumption of innocence, mike weinberg even if the materials in his possession "found reasonable grounds to believe that the material may adversely affect the public safety" ( I did not make it). Having said all that, here's another thing that will tell you why has no one but not the spring Horowitz whiplash refers to the relationship between the exposure mike weinberg of the mine and the personal journey of revenge (allegedly, allegedly) who can launch SMS half the CIS after a journalist and origin unprecedented? Why did not anyone ask what was the father of Benaiah the IDF's computer in his home? Why did not anyone ask what Boaz Harpaz secret material stolen from the army as part of its commanders revenge, leaked from his computer because of a virus that sent him without his knowledge, and endangering mike weinberg human life in a clear and immediate? Why Benaiah lawyer can say that "it is written in the documents" confidential "This classification formality" (the quote is accurate, I'd be happy to fix it) and threw me down the stairs with this argument, though that has ceased cut it was also true in my documents? Why I sat for two years, two months and two days something will come out of it Benayahu probably putt with a loan and savings?
There is opportunity to law enforcement or security forces to show that they truly seek to protect the security of the state and its citizens. They are really looking for information security to deter offenders. Are fair and examine cases by severity and not by the perpetrator. Which is not only smart and punish Corporal full extent of the law also Brigadier General, even though he whispers in my ear all kinds attract all kinds of wires.
Indeed. Simply choose to ignore the issue, just as you ignored when you stuck on the bus.
"On Sunday (30.10), a few hours after the judgment was given the law of the Anat Kam, asked chief Colonel. mike weinberg Avi Benayahu on" all talk "network B, is a former military correspondent in Al Civil Guard" leaked military documents held him . Avi Benayahu Miron kindly requested palm and Carmela Menashe optional - not answer the question. Dodge did not stop him from firing catapults of patriotism Kam's address, even though it expressed regret for what she had done. "
The question is equally relevant. The answer is not necessarily the same answer. Maybe, maybe not. May be that having the documents by Benaiah, perilous as holding your case, you may among Benaiah holding more dangerous and less for you. You may whom the holding is less dangerous and more with you. I do not know. It depends on the content of the documents and what level of risk should they fall into hostile hands and what chance [actually risk] or the probability that they will fall into hostile hands in your case compared to his case.
Maybe there's another difference. Maybe I'm not knowledgeable enough detail but there may be a difference in psychological element of the offense [Manes lung mens rea]. Benayahu may be held negligent ie the document is deliberately not taken any document held by the military but he may forget mike weinberg it exists on the computer. There may be a difference in ads or criminal intent. Negligence offenses are less serious offenses of criminal mike weinberg intent.
About penal legal response, I can not say what will be the end of what would be the punishment What will the verdict. In your case we are after the verdict in his case we are at the beginning of the criminal justice procedure, has not even filed an indictment we are only at the stage of "detention days," the police investigation has not been completed so that seemed a long.
I agree that in terms of the desired law [as opposed mike weinberg to existing law] formal classification of a document, for example, "top mike weinberg secret" should not be conclusive evidence or conclusive evidence dangerous. mike weinberg If there is a gap between the formal classification and the real danger as indicated herein substantive content, information and risk assessment information true that, then you need to determine the actual risk is not the formal classification. mike weinberg Abnormal situation that a document is classified top secret, despite the risk of leaking does not justify such a classification.
I am of the opinion that in your case a prison sentence was too severe. Was not justified but cut prison sentence he is not in prison. This is a moral rather than a legal argument that is, moral sentence was excessive strict and worsened with you too. [Legal claim is a different argument, because it relates not only to moral considerations mike weinberg but sentencing policies and precedents of the Supreme Court]
Whether in the case of Benaiah justified imprisonment or imprisonment at all the same length as yours in particular, depends on which previous offenses, what is the factual picture, empirical what are the circumstances. mike weinberg And a range of sentencing considerations including the related individual punishment for that offense itself personal circumstances.
If the legal system discriminates between defendants are convicted, with similar offenses, similar circumstances and individual considerations similar then with A is making mike weinberg it easier and B is stricter It is immoral. This discrimination. This violation of the right to equality. Equal enforcement.
But there are two ways to correct the discrimination. Compare them according to the level of punishment or comparable relief by level of severe punishment. If I think the comparison by ranking high punishment is immoral and it is better comparison would be punished by the lower ranks, so not only immoral discrimination is also worth
No comments:
Post a Comment