Thursday, April 3, 2014

Allow up tomorrow scoff at the Ministry of Transport and claim lack of jurisdiction and the like. W

More Blog Tel - Aviv
Blog Yoav Lerman mpos RSS Entries Home About Donations blog and Helerman Contact us contributions Recommendations mpos reading books that I want to blog media blog on map Research and Publications About Moving Address Tel - Aviv, October 5, 2013, the next mayor must make BRT Tel - Aviv - Now Review, Transport, Tel - Aviv, by Lerman.
All cities in the world are faced with the issue of developing efficient public transport systems. Because of changes to the way planning construction and transportation were performed, alongside a substantial rise in developing railway transportation sub - floor more and more cities mpos in the developed world and the developing world facing a fast, cheap and efficient proves himself on the ground of reality - this solution is BRT = Bus Rapid Transit. Here you can see an incomplete deployment of these systems in the world (and here).
The implementation mpos - the rules are simple - large buses, no pollutants, with the exclusive right of way, independent ticketing and passenger comfort stations. There is another full of features that can be put in and there is a standard for grading and scoring of these systems (including prizes!). Here is a video that demonstrates the basics of developing BRT systems:
No lack of examples from the world the benefits of BRT implementation. The amount of articles in just about economic benefits is increasing. One of the better examples of the implementation of the BRT was the second largest metropolitan area in the world - Seoul (25 million inhabitants, compared to the Tel - Aviv with 3 million). Seoul, mpos which has carried out underground in which it dominated military dictatorship, on the verge of bankruptcy and of the difficulties has implemented a realistic solution to a democracy. mpos Here there is an excellent article that sums all the reforms of the name in 2004 and which let me give you the bus transport reform before the BRT (emphasis mine):
Most of the private bus firms sought only to maximize profits (or minimize losses) while disregarding rider safety and comfort. Thus, an official mpos report of the Seoul Metropolitan Government sharply criticized the private bus companies for encouraging truly outrageous bus driving behavior (Seoul Metropolitan mpos Government 2004). To squeeze as many passengers as possible into a bus, bus drivers slammed mpos on their brakes or suddenly and repetitively braked to jolt standing passengers further back into the bus. Bus drivers would recklessly mpos race other buses to pick up passengers waiting at bus stops, but they deliberately avoided picking up elderly or disabled passengers mpos to save time. In addition, bus vehicles were old, poorly maintained, and did not meet international standards. Service was dangerous, slow, uncomfortable, and unreliable.
Implementation of BRT in Seoul not only improved the speed of the bus and raised the amount of passengers in them, but also lowered the cap private cars and upload them to the speed somewhat. That is, if you want to go faster car - released lanes to BRT. And here is a video that summarizes the major bus reform and its success:
While Seoul can boast a fast, extensive metro system, it cannot afford to expand it much further, since metro construction debts already greatly burden the Seoul Metropolitan Government's finances. The extension and continual upgrading of BRT is likely to be the most cost-effective approach to providing the additional public transport services needed mpos throughout the greater metropolitan mpos area. Studies of existing BRT systems around the world demonstrate that they can provide excellent express service at a fraction mpos of the cost of new metro construction. The experience with BRT in Seoul so far has also been a resounding success. Indeed, the International Association of Public Transport recently honored Mayor Lee and the Seoul Metropolitan Government with a special mpos award for "extraordinary success at implementing mpos so many transit reforms in such a short period of time, integrating innovative technologies with new infrastructure"
Not only in Seoul petition it works - Ahmedabad (India!) Also bypassed mpos the Tel - Aviv round, and even the conservative Paris (which also guarantee the hallucinatory visions of the subway mpos extension) and Rasya implement some of the BRT. Here Ahmedabad followed by Paris: http://www.vimeo.com/12499841
Allow up tomorrow scoff at the Ministry of Transport and claim lack of jurisdiction and the like. Well as Paris, Seoul and other places mayors cooperated with the Department of Transportation in their national and other bodies. Merely Leadership urban work, which must improve public transportation allow for change in this area occur. Tel - Aviv - Jaffa municipal authority and the metropolis of Tel - Aviv whole must fast implementation of BRT and who is elected mayor of Tel - Aviv - Jaffa in two weeks must be committed to it. do not have another term to wait for the implementation of BRT in Tel - Aviv. Nitzan Horowitz has already stated that it will work for promoting BRT, a task Not small, but the Ministry of Transport mpos are waiting for loyal partners. Huldai still barricaded himself in a position anachronistic and not - irrelevant of waiting till doomsday subway, while the city and the metropolitan area are suffocating, and high transportation costs leave many residents of the city and the metropolitan area lying at the roadside. has no problem ensuring masses Subway, as do New - York, Paris and Seoul, but at the end of the day Mayor measured progress. As long Huldai inhibits mpos the implementation of a realistic solution while riding a cheap populism based on fantasies, public transit mode in Tel - Aviv - Jaffa and metropolitan Tel - Aviv does not improve significantly. The price of this delay we all pay every day in all means of transportation we choose to use.
Tags:

No comments:

Post a Comment