Because ifc films she has no coherent style. Different shapes, fonts, colors from different scales,

Because ifc films she has no coherent style. Different shapes, fonts, colors from different scales, different ideas and philosophies are unconnected to each other. Different elements are but only understood as a coherent whole, if there is a higher-level unit that integrates the individual elements. It's the same with the concept of media. He only has explanatory value sufficient, ie it is only "nice" if it has the unity of the difference.
Here, in brief, what I presume for such a concept of media: The didactics of history need not have its own definition of media - they may not have their own concept of media. She needs instead of the same media term as any other individual sciences, and indeed fulfills one of the following requirements: It must be scientifically instead alltagsbegrifflich - not to be confused with "everyday use". For it is wrong to assume that science would be more complex (and therefore also more complicated) than the practice. Quite the contrary: the science must strive even to capture as complex as necessary the essence of becoming ifc films much more complex ifc films practice. Thus, the term must also be sufficiently complex rather simplistic reductionist. And he must be in coherence with an equally scientific or social concept of culture and humanity. He has historically thinking conceptualize the turbulent present that is related to the "new technology".
Media - usually ifc films understood ifc films as a mediator, as empty containers that are filled with content and transport them from one place to another - not only in the educational life. In educational contexts, understanding ifc films looks like this: A subject can or should to complying with an object-learning. That can not be right by him is incorporated in the literal sense, as you know since Vygotsky at the latest. Even the perception about the biological sense is not a direct and merely biological process, but a socially mediated, based on socially acquired awareness programs (As you can read in Merlin Donald "A Mind So Rare" very nice). Perception and learning ifc films need instrumental mediator. However, this mediating objects are not the same media. At least not according to the modern scientific concept of media, even if they are equated in everyday use with them. According to the modern ifc films concept of media are media, especially information and communications media, located on a different epistemological level as the "mediating objects" Vygotsky. I basically want to represent as:
The ratio means to medium is not additive, so no 3 + 1 ratio, but a 3 in 4 ratio (Schürmann). Learning processes take place against the backdrop of the respective media constellation. ifc films The equation of means and media (! Not just about the numbers, but also the objects) is the norm in educational theory and practice; and this equation is momentous. But if the "new media" ifc films actually only new types of agents would be those learning objects in brains "mediated", for example, not be an explanation why they produce such great turmoil in the world and in all areas of society, as they but has been shown to do. What the level of the medium is, what exactly is medium?
Logically, we must speak of a media situation in which all media - old and new - interact in a historically specific structure. Society is - from systems theory - still process and outcome ifc films of communications. This need has always been media, not only since the famous "new media". Media themselves are complex and contain various levels: We have the level of equipment, which is the physical material ifc films plane, each specific entry requirement. In computer language: ifc films the hardware. This includes the biological devices, such as the larynx and vocal cords, without which the medium "spoken language" is not possible. Behind Siri puts a larynx with vocal chords, namely by Susan Bennett. Secondly, there is the level of the instruments or tools. This is the level of the media forms or programs. Based on the medium of language would be the linguistic level and the forms or genres. And thirdly, the entire medial plane Societal and cultural level, in computer language: the "operating system" of culture. This affects the communication ifc films rules, codes, discourses and contexts of meaning. The language concerning would be the semiotic level. It also relates to the epistemological conditions, that is, what people need to understand in order to participate in a given culture.
I advocate only this latter level "M